Search for: All records

Recent results using wind and sea surface temperature data from satellites and high-resolution coupled models suggest that mesoscale ocean–atmosphere interactions affect the locations and evolution of storms and seasonal precipitation over continental regions such as the western US and Europe. The processes responsible for this coupling are difficult to verify due to the paucity of accurate air–sea turbulent heat and moisture flux data. These fluxes are currently derived by combining satellite measurements that are not coincident and have differing and relatively low spatial resolutions, introducing sampling errors that are largest in regions with high spatial and temporal variability. Observational errors related to sensor design also contribute to increased uncertainty. Leveraging recent advances in sensor technology, we here describe a satellite mission concept, FluxSat, that aims to simultaneously measure all variables necessary for accurate estimation of ocean–atmosphere turbulent heat and moisture fluxes and capture the effect of oceanic mesoscale forcing. Sensor design is expected to reduce observational errors of the latent and sensible heat fluxes by almost 50%. FluxSat will improve the accuracy of the fluxes at spatial scales critical to understanding the coupled ocean–atmosphere boundary layer system, providing measurements needed to improve weather forecasts and climate model simulations. 

Abstract Accurate representation of air‐sea interaction is crucial to numerical prediction of the ocean, weather, and climate. Sea surface temperature (SST) gradients and surface currents in the oceanic mesoscale regime are known to have significant influence on air‐sea fluxes of momentum. Studies based on high‐resolution numerical models and observations reveal that SST gradients and surface currents in the submesoscale regime are much stronger than those in the mesoscale. However, the feedback between the submesoscale processes and the air‐sea turbulent fluxes is not well understood. To quantitatively assess the responses between air‐sea flux of momentum and submesoscale processes, a non‐hydrostatic ocean model is implemented in this study. The inclusion of SST gradients and surface currents in air‐sea bulk fluxes are argued to be significant for modeling accurate wind stress in the submesoscale regime. Taking both into account, this study shows that the linear relationship between wind stress curl/divergence and crosswind/downwind SST gradients existing in the mesoscale regime is not obvious in the submesoscale. Instead, a linear relationship between wind stress curl/divergence and surface current curl/divergence is revealed in the submesoscale. Furthermore, the magnitude of wind stress curl introduced by submesoscale processes is much greater than that presented by mesoscale processes. Another key finding is that tracer subduction and potential vorticity distribution in the submesoscale is susceptible to submesoscale‐modified air‐sea turbulent momentum flux. This study serves as a starting point in investigating the feedbacks between atmospheric and oceanic submesoscale processes. 

Abstract The axisymmetric structure of the inner-core hurricane boundary layer (BL) during intensification [IN; intensity tendency ≥20 kt (24 h)−1, where 1 kt ≈ 0.5144 m s−1], weakening [WE; intensity tendency <−10 kt (24 h)−1], and steady-state [SS; the remainder] periods are analyzed using composites of GPS dropwindsondes from reconnaissance missions between 1998 and 2015. A total of 3091 dropsondes were composited for analysis below 2.5-km elevation—1086 during IN, 1042 during WE, and 963 during SS. In nonintensifying hurricanes, the low-level tangential wind is greater outside the radius of maximum wind (RMW) than for intensifying hurricanes, implying higher inertial stability (I2) at those radii for nonintensifying hurricanes. Differences in tangential wind structure (and I2) between the groups also imply differences in secondary circulation. The IN radial inflow layer is of nearly equal or greater thickness than nonintensifying groups, and all groups show an inflow maximum just outside the RMW. Nonintensifying hurricanes have stronger inflow outside the eyewall region, likely associated with frictionally forced ascent out of the BL and enhanced subsidence into the BL at radii outside the RMW. Equivalent potential temperatures (θe) and conditional stability are highest inside the RMW of nonintensifying storms, which is potentially related to TC intensity. At greater radii, inflow layer θe is lowest in WE hurricanes, suggesting greater subsidence or more convective downdrafts at those radii compared to IN and SS hurricanes. Comparisons of prior observational and theoretical studies are highlighted, especially those relating BL structure to large-scale vortex structure, convection, and intensity.